GE Signa Voyager Artifact tips and workarounds solutions guide provides quick resolutions to the most common MRI artifacts. Whether you are experiencing image quality issues or looking for the latest GE Signa Voyager applications resources, this article contains everything you need to know about image artifacts on the Signa Voyager 1.5T MRI platform. Use the table of contents below to quickly jump to a section or use ctrl+F to search by keyword.
The following information is for reference only. All procedures should be verified in the GE MRI Signa Voyager operator manual available for download at https://www.gehealthcare.com/support/documentation. MRIPETCTSOURCE is not responsible for the misuse of material. See disclaimer below for additional information.
Annefact is a signal artifact that appears as ribbons of signal smeared through the image. This artifact is caused by signal generated outside the scan FOV that are detected by the receiver.
In FSE scans, Annefact appears as bright, ghosting signals through the image in the phase direction. It typically appears on sagittal spines or pelvis scans using a phased array surface coil.
Annefact artifacts originate far from the isocenter, where the gradients are non-linear, similar to a Star artifact. Uncompensated eddy currents in this area cause phase errors in the compressed signal. As a result, this signal is smeared through the image.
An annefact is displayed in the following FSE sagittal cervical spine image, which was acquired with CTLOP, 24 cm FOV, and swapped phase and frequency.
To prevent a C-spine artifact, select 2 coils like CS12 that closely match the scan FOV and avoid swapping phase and frequency. Additionally, use Annefact Suppression User CV.
Placing the HD Knee Array coil at isocenter can result in an annefact artifact on the sagittal or coronal knee images. To prevent this, the coil should be positioned right or left off-center, within a range of 60 to 120 mm. Specifically, the recommended positioning range is approximately 60 to 70 mm off-center.
Several conditions can cause a high background noise on a spectrum. These include:
Under specific conditions, a high background noise can occur on a spectrum when setting a spectroscopy localized volume approximately 50 mm or farther from iso-center. Additionally, turning on the User CV AWS optimization can also cause this issue.
The occurrence of poor chemical fat SAT uniformity in C-spine imaging is influenced by various factors. These include:
Poor chemical Fat Sat uniformity can arise in C-spine imaging due to poor B0 uniformity in the C-spine region. This phenomenon is commonly referred to as a bulk susceptibility artifact.
B0 uniformity depends on various factors such as the patient’s size, shape, and positioning within the magnet. A static magnetic field can become inhomogeneous within a patient due to their irregular geometry and the distribution of material magnetic susceptibility. As a result, certain regions of inhomogeneity can cause poor fat suppression.
In the C-spine region, for instance, variations in the B0 field exceeding 3 ppm can exist, which is roughly the fat-water separation range. Consequently, imaging sequences that rely on chemical saturation to achieve fat suppression are highly sensitive to Bo inhomogeneity, which can cause regions to exhibit partial or incomplete fat saturation.
To minimize poor chemical fat SAT uniformity and bulk susceptibility artifact in C-spine imaging:
A ring-like artifact can occur on T2-weighted EPI DWI/DTI, ADC/eADC, and Synthetic DWI images due to intense orbit signal.
Using the HyperBand Imaging Option with the DWI scan and type-in PSD: epi2altoff can cause the ring artifact to occur on superior brain slices.
To minimize the artifact, position an angled anterior SAT band over the orbits (not the cortex) to suppress the orbit signal intensity.
The epi2alt type-in PSD is another method that potentially reduces eyeball artifact. It reverses or swaps the distortion direction from the default DWI PSD.
When a voxel contains both fat and water and the TE is timed for the vectors to be in or out of phase, chemical shift effects can occur.
Boundaries between fat and tissues with much water can either be bright or dark. When using certain PSDs like FSPGR, one can select the TE as either In Phase or Out of Phase. Choosing In Phase will result in a bright fat/water border, while Out of Phase will make the fat/water boundary dark and structures will appear outlined with a black marker.
To minimize this effect, select In Phase as the TE parameter or manually enter a TE parameter as close to the fat/water in-phase time as possible.
| Phase: In Or Out | 1.5T MRI |
|---|---|
| In Phase | 0.0 |
| Out of Phase | 2.2 |
| In Phase | 4.4 |
| Out of Phase | 6.6 |
Normally, saturation effects cause a dark vessel signal in T1-weighted images. In regions with a short T1, this can be clinically confusing. An in-flow effect around the edge slices or in 2D multiple acquisitions with an interleaved slice order causes the vessel signal to become bright.
To minimize the artifact caused by slow flow signal, use the In-flow signal reduction User CV with 2D FSPGR or 2D Dual Echo.
MR conditional metal implants can cause ringing, stripe, signal void and image distortion artifacts.
MAVRIC SL, a one-click imaging application, can reduce the artifacts, but not remove them entirely.
The MRI RF receiver efficiently detects signals closest to it, which can cause non-uniform signal in the image. Surface coils show more localized bright areas close to the coil than volume coils. This variability may cause incomplete fat suppression in chemical fat suppression techniques.
Consider using a different coil or applying coil intensity correction techniques to address non-uniform signal.
Instead of additional fat saturation techniques, try a STIR sequence.
For surface coils, localized bright areas close to the coil may appear, but PURE and SCIC/SCENIC techniques can help minimize these variations. Consult the PURE technique for more information on using compatible surface coils.
PROPELLER generates unique or different artifacts. Below are ways to minimize them. Consider these trade-offs: as frequency resolution increases, crinkling increases; increase ETL to reduce crinkling. As ETL increases, TE increases; increase Bandwidth to lower TE. As Bandwidth increases, SNR decreases.
A crinkling artifact on PROPELLER sequences can be caused by:
Increase scan FOV to fully contain the anatomy. If that does not resolve issue, increase ETL.
Not having enough data to perform motion correction causes top of scalp artifacts.
Try prescribing fewer slices to cover only anatomy of interest.
Blurred images occur in all three PROPELLER applications due to inadequate blade matching, resulting in poor blade correlation. The GE syslog displays the message “Image quality may be degraded due to poor blade correlation…”
Signal voids in DW PROPELLER can result in black holes on the diffusion-weighted images, but not in every scan. These voids may be caused by system calibrations out of spec, such as eddy currents. To resolve, contact your MRI service engineer to ensure system is within specification.
Wrap can cause ripples in PROPELLER images, and they can be observed with all three applications.
However, due to the radial acquisition, the ripples look different. To prevent wrap, increase the FOV or reposition the slice prescription.
All PROPELLER applications are susceptible to Annefact artifact, but it may appear differently due to the radial acquisition technique. To prevent or reduce Annefact:
| FOV Size | Oversampling Factor |
|---|---|
| < 14cm | 3 |
| < 20cm | 2.5 |
| < 40cm | 2 |
| >/= 40cm | 1.5 |
In PROPELLER sequences, RF leak shows as criss-crossed lines. In GRE sequences, RF leak appears as a zipper artifact. To resolve, contact your MRI service engineer to troubleshoot source of RF leak.
RF inhomogeneity artifacts appear as drop in signal intensity in a section of the anatomy. This often indicates the presence of ferromagnetic material or the failure of an MRI coil element.
First, verify with the patient that no artifact is caused by anything on or inside them. Then, perform manual prescan and inspect each coil element. Discontinue coil use if faulty receive channel is found. Consult with your MRI service engineer upon isolating a faulty element.
Shading artifacts appear as areas of reduced signal intensity or bands of signal cancellation. Improper positioning of the coil or patient often causes shading artifacts.
Star artifact is a peripheral signal artifact that appears as a bright spot close to the middle of the image, caused by signals generated outside the desired FOV. The signals that originate far from isocenter and are not crushed out in the non-linear region.
Avoid swapping phase and frequency, use Annefact Suppression User CV, and use a 3-coil selection, such as USCTS234, for closer surface coil coverage matching the scan FOV.
When scanning with surface coils, keep these basic principles in mind:
When k-space data is not fully acquired, the truncation artifact can appear around bright tissue and spread along the partial k-space direction. Additionally, this artifact is intensified if the brightness changes sharply.
Diffusion Weighted Echo Planar Imaging combines partial k-space acquisition with homodyne reconstruction. Rotational motion during the diffusion lobe shifts k-space data, causing wormhole-like artifacts. The artifact frequency increases with higher b-values due to stronger diffusion gradient lobes.
Non-conductive padding can be used to support the sides of the patient’s head and restraints can be applied to prevent rotational motion in the A/P direction to prevent in-plane rotational motion.
In conclusion, the GE Signa Voyager platform offers flexible imaging options and workarounds to resolve MRI artifacts. We are happy to provide you with the radiology resources to resolve your GE Signa Voyager MRI artifact. You can find related resources in the GE Signa Voyager Operator Manual Procedures page. Also, consider signing up to our newsletter below to stay up to date on the latest technical resources.
MRI laser alignment landmark assembly with class 2 laser
CT scan ring artifact explained. CT scan machine pictured left, CT ring artifact example pictured right.
2025 MedicalImagingSource.com – Images available for licensed use. Learn more.
Visual representation of MRI magnetic field lines. License this image
The information provided by MRIPETCTSOURCE (“we,” “us,” or “our”) on https://www.medicalimagingsource.com (the “Site”) is for general informational purposes only. All information on the Site is provided in good faith, however we make no representation or warranty of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, availability, or completeness of any information on the Site. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE SHALL WE HAVE ANY LIABILITY TO YOU FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY KIND INCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE USE OF THE SITE OR RELIANCE ON ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THE SITE. YOUR USE OF THE SITE AND YOUR RELIANCE ON ANY INFORMATION ON THE SITE IS SOLELY AT YOUR OWN RISK.